Reader points out why distance shouldn’t be the true measure of success on the PGA Tour
There is much interest now about controlling the bombers (“Taking the long view on golf’s power craze,” July 16; “From the Morning Read inbox,” July 17). A few points:
1. Being the longest driver doesn't necessarily equate to the lowest score.
2. Changing the ball or coefficient of restitution, known as COR, still leaves the bomber with the same advantage.
3. The fans want to see feats of golf that are beyond their capability.
4. The only course changes that would “need” to be done are on those courses used by the PGA Tour. Most others would benefit more by being made easier (from forward tees).
5. Rather than lengthening a PGA Tour course, make the rough more penal. Or, just let the fairway grow so they don't get 75-yard runouts. Cut the grass afterwards.
Morning Read invites reader comment. Write to editor Steve Harmon at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please provide your name and city of residence. If your comment is selected for publication, Morning Read will contact you to verify the authenticity of the email and confirm your identity. We will not publish your email address. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and brevity.
Sign up to receive the Morning Read newsletter, along with Where To Golf Next and The Equipment Insider.