Hawk & Purk podcast comes down a bit too hard on Tiger Woods-Phil Mickelson rematch, golf fan contends, pointing to the action as delicious entertainment
The Hawk & Purk podcasts are always informative and entertaining. The recent discussion by co-hosts John Hawkins and Mike Purkey and their grading of the Tiger Woods-Peyton Manning vs. Phil Mickelson-Tom Brady match at a B (Purkey) or B- (Hawkins) is interesting (“Episode 18: A successful sequel for Tiger Woods, Phil Mickelson,” May 27).
As journalists reviewing an event, is it always required to view the proceedings with unfiltered eyes? But I appreciate their perspective.
As a golf fan, I found “The Match: Champions for Charity” to be quite entertaining. I would give it an A. Critical reviews are a journalist's meat and potatoes.
I looked past the delay, the relatable poor play by non-professionals and a less-than-experienced Turner Sports network in this time of no tournaments. To me, it was a banana-split sundae with a chocolate-chip-cookie chaser.
St. Johns, Fla.
Morning Read invites reader comment. Write to editor Steve Harmon at firstname.lastname@example.org. Please provide your name and city of residence. If your comment is selected for publication, Morning Read will contact you to verify the authenticity of the email and confirm your identity. We will not publish your email address. We reserve the right to edit for clarity and brevity.
Sign up to receive the Morning Read newsletter, along with Where To Golf Next and The Equipment Insider.